Tuesday, October 21, 2014

H1N1 a factor in Soldier's death

Spc. Christopher Hogg



















FORT JACKSON, S.C. -- Autopsy results have concluded that the recent death of a Fort Jackson Basic Combat Training Soldier was caused by pneumonia due to the H1N1 flu.

The report, released Sept. 30, states that Spc. Christopher Hogg, 23, of
Deltona, Fla., died Sept. 10 from complications from the H1N1 virus.

"First and foremost, we here at Fort Jackson send our most sincere condolences to Specialist Hogg's family and friends," said Brig. Gen. Bradley May, Fort Jackson Commander. "This great young man entered our Army as a volunteer to serve our country while it remains at war. On behalf of a grateful nation, we salute and honor his patriotism and his service."

Hogg was in his fifth week of training with Company D, 3rd Battalion, 13th Infantry Regiment, when he became ill Sept. 1 and sought treatment from Moncrief Army Community Hospital. He was admitted to a Columbia hospital Sept. 3 for further care.

For the last several months Fort Jackson leaders have been preparing and taking proactive measures to prevent a possible outbreak of the H1N1 strain of flu. This past summer, a high-level working group drawn from military, medical, logistical and safety leaders was formed to analyze and address the many issues surrounding increased flu season risk. This resulted in a plan to reduce the potential number of Soldiers and family members who become ill with either strain of the flu. This group will continue to meet regularly throughout the flu season to assess the situation and modify methods as necessary.

"I want to assure you that everyone at Fort Jackson aggressively works to protect our Soldiers and families from all aspects of influenza," May said. "Our efforts continue to focus on prevention and - if necessary - isolation and treatment while simultaneously performing our essential mission of training Soldiers to defend our nation."

Preventive measures that have been implemented include:
-- Emphasizing personal hygiene actions such as proper and frequent hand washing; use of hand sanitizer when soap and water is not available; coughing into the crook of the arm instead of the hands; keeping hands away from the eyes, nose and mouth; avoiding close contact with people who display influenza-like symptoms and encouraging those who are ill to remain home until fever free for 24 hours.
-- Soldiers and cadre have been provided with alcohol-based hand sanitizers.
-- Hand sanitation stations have been placed across the installation.
-- Barracks are managed to ensure adequate living space and that bunks are oriented head to toe, thus creating "breathing zones," since most respiratory diseases are transmitted primarily via large virus-laden droplets propelled by coughing and sneezing.
-- Standards for barracks hygiene have been improved to include; using bleach and water to clean all surfaces and cleaning high-use areas daily. These include bathroom floors, sinks, showers, toilets, doorknobs and light switches.
-- On a weekly basis, all soiled laundry and linen are laundered, all floors are mopped and horizontal surfaces are cleaned.
-- Every three weeks, Soldiers turn in blankets, pillows and mattress covers for laundering.
-- At the end of each training cycle, all barracks and barracks furniture are given a thorough cleaning using the same methods.
-- There has been an increase in the frequency of checking the air quality within the barracks to reduce airborne transmitted viruses.

"During the past six months we have isolated and treated Soldiers with influenza like illness. We believe we have succeeded in limiting the spread of influenza because of this focus," May said. "We have consistently adhered to the guidelines established by CDC for testing and evaluation for influenza like illness."

Every new Soldier arriving at Fort Jackson is screened for flu like symptoms. Seasonal flu vaccinations began Sept 15. New Soldiers will get vaccinations upon arrival. Vaccination teams are in place to vaccinate the Soldiers already here as well as all eligible beneficiaries.

Health officials expect to receive the H1N1 vaccine in October and will begin vaccinating shortly thereafter in accordance with established guidelines.

"We are doing everything possible to protect Soldiers, family members and civilians who live, work and visit Fort Jackson," May said.   
UN Biodiversity Conference Pushes Global Redistribution, Restriction, Regimentation

“Resource mobilization” and “capacity building” were two of the key terms that dominated the recently concluded United Nations “biodiversity” conference in Korea. “Resource mobilization,” as the reader may guess, refers to increasing government funding (i.e., increasing taxation) to support biodiversity programs and research. “Capacity building,” a favorite phrase at the UN, refers to foreign aid transfers from the developed to the lesser developed countries, which means either government-to-government or government-to-UN agency transfers of wealth.

The 12th meeting of the Conference of Parties (COP12) to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity closed on Friday, October 17, in Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea, calling for a doubling of “total biodiversity-related international financial resource flows to developing countries.” In addition to increasing direct foreign aid, this will mean a big increase in funding through the World Bank, African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank and other UN-aligned regional development banks — all of which are funded by taxes extracted by member governments. Moreover, the conferees agreed that all governments should increase their domestic spending on biodiversity.
The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD, also known as the UN Biodiversity Treaty) is one of the huge agreements that emerged from the UN’s 1992 Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, an enviro-socialist confab better known as the Earth Summit.

Other major documents to come out of the Rio summit are: the Convention on Climate Change; Agenda 21; the Convention to Combat Desertification; and the Forest Principles Consensus. President George H.W. Bush attended the Earth Summit and signed the Climate Change Convention, but did not sign the CBD. The United States and Andorra are the only two members of the United Nations that have not yet ratified the agreement.

For the past couple of decades the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has operated in the shadow of the UN global warming campaign, which has received the lion’s share of funding and media exposure. However, as we reported in 2012 during that year’s Rio+20 Earth Summit, the UN is moving its biodiversity effort to the frontline, as it accelerates its multi-pronged push using various environmental pretexts to empower itself as a global government.
According to an official press release from the biodiversity conference on October 17, a new “roadmap” was adopted to speed up implementation of the “biodiversity targets” set at Aichi, Japan in 2010. It states:
Key decisions, including those on resource mobilization, capacity building, scientific and technical cooperation linking biodiversity and poverty eradication, and on monitoring of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity, form the “Pyeongchang roadmap for the enhanced implementation of the strategic plan and achievement of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.” These actions will strengthen capacity and increase support for countries and stakeholders to implement their National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans.
"The decisions made at COP 12 here in Pyeongchang will leapfrog efforts to achieve the Aichi targets and put biodiversity on a stronger footing for decades to come,” declared UN Under-Secretary-General and Executive Director of the UN Environment Programme  Achim Steiner. “The outcome of this meeting shows that plausible pathways exist to realize a reduction in biodiversity loss and in turn address broader global priorities in the context of the Post-2015 development agenda," he continued.

The “Post-2015 development agenda" to which Steiner referred is the replacement for the UN’s Millennium Development Goals, its global wealth redistribution program disguised as “aid to the poor,” which was hatched at the UN’s Millennium Summit in 2000. The UN General Assembly is working on its “Sustainable Development Goals” to replace the Millennium Development Goals next year.

Most of the news reports on the conference that have mentioned the development goals have spoken only of the two major proposals: for conservation of terrestrial and marine plant and animal species. Since that includes the entire surface of the planet, the potential for havoc by government-run-amok is already very great; but there is much more that has not been reported. Guidance for the much of the biodiversity process is being provided by a new report issued at the 3-week-long Pyeongchang conference, entitled Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. It is subtitled: "mid-term assessment of progress towards the implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020.”
Among other things, Global Biodiversity Outlook 4 indicates that the UN’s broad view of biodiversity encompasses virtually all activities and areas of human society: food, nutrition, health, agriculture, water, sanitation, and much more. It states (page 142):

The Open Working Group (OWG), established by the General Assembly to prepare a proposal
on the sustainable development goals proposes 17 such goals, each supported by targets specifying outcomes and means of implementation. Two of the proposed goals address, respectively biodiversity in marine and terrestrial ecosystems, and the proposed targets under these goals draw heavily on several of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Biodiversity and ecosystems are also reflected under other proposed goals, notably those on food, nutrition and agriculture and on water and sanitation.

Biodiversity is also important for the proposed goals on poverty eradication, health, settlements,
disaster risk reduction and climate change, and references therein could be strengthened. The need for sustainable consumption and production is also reflected in the proposed goals as is more equitable access to natural resources. Notably, the proposed text calls for the integration of biodiversity values into national and local planning, development processes and poverty reduction strategies and accounts. The text also calls for enhanced policy coherence for sustainable development and the development of measurements of progress on sustainable development that complement GDP. It is expected that the SDGs will be finalized by the United Nations in 2015 as part of the post-2015 development agenda.
 
Many observers may be surprised to learn that the world planners  at the UN are defining biodiversity in ways that justify empowering governments to run roughshod over virtually everything. However, there should be no surprise, since that clearly was the plan from the start. As mentioned above, the CBD is one of the revolutionary documents to be birthed at the 1992 Earth summit. It is an integral component of Agenda 21 (the UN Agenda for the 21st Century), the magnum opus released that year at Rio, and signed by President Bush (Senior).
Chapter 15 of Agenda 21, entitled, “Conservation of Biological Diversity,” begins with these two paragraphs:
15.1. The objectives and activities in this chapter of Agenda 21 are intended to improve the conservation of biological diversity and the sustainable use of biological resources, as well as to support the Convention on Biological Diversity.
15.2. Our planet's essential goods and services depend on the variety and variability of genes, species, and ecosystems. Biological resources feed and clothe us and provide housing, medicines and spiritual nourishment. The natural ecosystems of forests, savannahs, pastures and rangelands, deserts, tundras, rivers, lakes and seas contain most of the Earth's biodiversity. Farmers' fields and gardens are also of great importance as repositories, while gene banks, botanical gardens, zoos and other germplasm repositories make a small but significant contribution. The current decline in biodiversity is largely the result of human activity and represents a serious threat to human development.
 
As we reported in a 2011 article entitled, “Your Hometown & the United Nations’ Agenda 21,” the most accessible version of Agenda 21 to come out following the Rio summit was published under the title AGENDA 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet (Earthpress, 1993). It was edited by environmental-activist attorney Daniel Sitarz and enthusiastically endorsed by Earth Summit chief Maurice Strong. Sitarz’s high praise for Agenda 21, will, for any freedom-minded individual, serve as a damning indictment of the UN plan’s totalitarian ambitions. Sitarz rhapsodically states:
AGENDA 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by every person on Earth.... It calls for specific changes in the activities of all people....Effective execution of AGENDA 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced — a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level.
 
A “profound reorientation of all human society.” Required activities for “every person on Earth.” As we noted, “The tyrannical implications are so stunningly transparent that it seems impossible that any nation not overtly communist could endorse it. Yet it was unanimously endorsed by every nation at the summit, including the United States. Not even Stalin, Hitler, or Mao came close to proposing anything this all-intrusive and all-encompassing.”
 
The Convention on Biological Diversity and Agenda 21 are but two of the overt UN grabs for total global control which include: the Law of the Sea Treaty, the International Criminal Court, the Small Arms Treaty, Internet Governance, Convention on the Rights of the Child, and many more. All of which provide ample reason to Get US out of the United Nations, as The John Birch Society has wisely and courageously urged for five decades.
"Ron Klain is a sharp-elbowed Democratic political operative with no medical expertise. Tapping him as "Ebola czar" may not be the president's best move when, as it is, no one can believe a word the Obama administration says. And that's not just because Mr. Klain is yet another lobbyist recruited despite Mr. Obama's vow that his administration would shun lobbyists.

 Klain was also a central player in the president's Solyndra fraud, which soaked taxpayers for over half a billio...n dollars for the benefit of Obama cronies.

 In Faithless Execution, I recount the Solyndra fraud. It never got the attention it deserved - involving, as it did, potential felony fraud violations of federal law. Even for people who did give it attention at the time, Solyndra is so many Obama scandals ago that its unseemly details are tough to recall. The story is thus worth retelling. As our nerves fray over the Ebola crisis, it is a valuable window into the administration's priorities and an indicator of the level of trust we can put in the new czar's assurances.


 Solyndra was a solar-energy company backed by the family foundation of George Kaiser, an Oklahoma oil magnate and major Obama fundraiser. Prior to Obama's coming to power, Solyndra had sought government funding under the economically absurd 2005 Energy Policy Act. That law lets the government play venture capitalist, investing taxpayer money in private "green energy" boondoggles that cannot attract adequate market financing.


 Notwithstanding the Bush administration's zeal to hop on this politically correct bandwagon, it declined Solyndra's application. As one private analyst later put it, the company was "an absolute complete disaster," with operating expenses, including supply costs, nearly doubling its revenue - and that's without factoring in high capital and other costs in an industry with low profit margins. Given that solar-panel competitors backed by China were producing energy at drastically lower prices, the chance that Solyndra would ever become profitable was practically nonexistent.


 But in 2008, Americans elected as president a devotee of renewable-energy experiments who had enjoyed major support from Kaiser. Obviously, Solyndra backers were thrilled. The Department of Energy (DOE) continued to stiff-arm the company in the days just before Obama's inauguration, citing unresolved concerns. Yet, within just a week of the new president's taking office, a DOE staffer noted in an e-mail, "We are approaching the beginning of the approval process for Solyndra again."
Company officers and investors reportedly visited the White House no fewer than 20 times while the loan guarantee was being considered and, later, revised. In short order, Obama made Solyndra the very first recipient of a public loan guarantee when the Energy Act program was beefed up with "stimulus" spending. The loans and credits eventually amounted to a staggering $535 million."............
"Permit me to be the first to congratulate Obama for hugging and kissing a nurse. How chivalrous of him. But while he was busy giving himself double “atta-boys” for hugging hospital workers, I hugged the wife of Tyrone Woods, who Obama allowed to be murdered in Benghazi along with Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, and Glen Doherty. Obama did not lift a finger to rescue the Ambassador and the brave heroes who gave their all.

 While Obama was using a disaster that he has allowed to threaten America as an opportunity to pretend to be presidential, I spent my weekend with a member of Seal Team Six. While Obama was posing for the cameras and his media lapdogs, I was with retired Special Forces personnel. I was with a Navy SEAL who personally knew Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

 The heroes I was with did not have spouses who had spent their lives being ashamed of America.
The fact that I sat at the head table with Mrs. Tyrone Woods is more than Obama has done. Obama sent a White House contingent to the funeral of the black thug Michael Brown who was shot and killed by the police officer he attacked, but Obama has not given one word of solace to Mrs. Tyrone Woods or the families of Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, and Glen Doherty. I embraced Mrs. Woods, the wife of one of the men whose names should be indelibly etched in the minds of every American child and student as examples of sacrifice for their country. While obama was busy allowing no crisis to go to waste.

 Obama ignored the father of Tyrone Woods who was a guest at the State of the Union Address. But Obama was quick to assure America that if he had a son the boy would look like Trayvon Martin. Although he has yet to make clear if he was referring to the tattoos and gangsta’ behavior or skin color alone.

 Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were murdered saving the lives of 31 other Americans. Ambassador Stevens and Sean Smith were murdered almost immediately after the terrorist attack began.
Tyrone Woods ordered a fellow American off the embassy roof because the staff member said he was afraid he would never see his wife who was awaiting birth of their child. Tyrone Woods ordered him down minutes before the fatal mortar round that would take his life and the life of Glen Doherty was launched.

 Obama casually watched the terrorist attack in real time as aerial drones sent back live feeds, before going up to his private residence for dinner. He then left on a fund raising tour as Susan Rice was dispatched to spread the lies on the talk news program circuit that the attack was simply a group of Muslims who were upset over a video and who just happened to be in the area at that particular time.
Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty, Ambassador Stevens, and Sean Smith believed sacrificing their lives in service to America was their highest calling. Obama apparently believes his calling is to deceive the American people and treat the families and children of men and women who sacrificed their lives as if they are less than nothing."

Sunday, October 19, 2014


SAVE THE CHILDREN OF SOUTH AFRICA

 


http://youtu.be/RUnQK4TIL84

China is the biggest threat to the world

 

In general terms, we understand sovereignty to mean a nation's independence from other governments, and its freedom of choice to act politically. In history, there are many examples of sovereignty concentrated in a single ruler like the tsar-autocrats of Russia, or the French King Louis XIV, who declared, "I am the state." But states today have elaborate procedures that decentralize their sovereignty, for example, through periodic elections, independent courts, etc. For a constitutional republic like the United States, our sovereignty also includes an important central element described in the phrase, "Congress shall make no law.... "

 

We reject the idea that a king is sovereign, and we reject the idea that a few hundred congressmen in Washington are sovereign, even if we do have a right to vote for some of them. We say "the people are sovereign," and in a society based on individual rights this is more than a slogan. The U.S. Constitution makes its clearest general statement of popular sovereignty in the Bill of Rights, Amendment IX: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

 

Sovereignty includes not only our right to feel safe against a foreign army's invasion and to vote for those who make our laws, but it also touches a family's daily economic life, the right to own property, and to work and invest in private businesses. A large part of our sovereign "independence from government and freedom of choice to act politically" comes from the decentralized power of a free market economy. Popular political movements rely on fundraising and volunteers, who need the economic independence only a competitive capitalist economy provides. Democracy depends on a free market economic system, which in turn is based on consumer sovereignty, which is really "voting with dollars" for our favorite products and services. American political sovereignty is necessarily tied to the people's right to sell or buy whatever they find useful.

 

 

 

 

S Africa Chinese 'become black'

 

The High Court in South Africa has ruled that Chinese South Africans are to be reclassified as black people.

 

It made the order so that ethnic Chinese can benefit from government policies aimed at ending white domination in the private sector.

 

The Chinese Association of South Africa took the government to court, saying its members had been discriminated against.

 

An estimated 200,000 ethnic Chinese live in South Africa.

 

The association said their members often failed to qualify for business contracts and job promotions because they were regarded as whites.

 

The association said Chinese South Africans had faced widespread discrimination during the years of apartheid when they had been classified as people of mixed race.

 

The BBC's Mpho Lakaje in Johannesburg says the Broad-Based Economic Empowerment and the Employment Equity Acts were designed to eradicate the legacy of apartheid which left many black people impoverished.

 

THE WORLD

 

1. China and Germany

 

2. China and Russia

 

3. China and Brazil

 

4. China and Australia

 

5. China and Japan

 

6. India and Japan

 

7. Iran and Russia

 

8. China and Chile

 

9. China and the United Arab Emirates

 

10. China, Brazil, Russia, India and South Africa and northern Africa

 

But do you hear about any of this on the mainstream news?

Of course not.

 

They would rather focus on the latest celebrity scandal.

 

Right now, the global move away from the U.S. dollar is slow but steady.

 

At some point, some trigger event will likely cause it to become a stampede.

 

When that happens, demand for U.S. dollars and U.S. debt will disintegrate and interest rates will absolutely skyrocket.

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/sisterthundershow/2014/10/20/china-is-the-biggest-threat-to-the-world

Friday, October 17, 2014

CFR Globalists Outline Strategy for “North American Community

The global government-promoting Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) published a new report this month demanding further integration of North America, calling for deeper “cooperation” on everything from energy, law enforcement, and healthcare to labor regulations, trade, and education. With the globalist architects well aware of how unpopular their sought-after “North American Union” scheme remains among the public, the CFR appears to have toned down some of its extreme anti-sovereignty rhetoric. Instead, the new report emphasizes what the outfit called a “new focus” on North America dealing primarily with energy, "community," and "security." The scheme, however, remains just as radical.

“In sum, we recommend a new partnership for North America, a new model for the world of integration and cooperation among sovereign states,” the report claims, paying phony lip service to national sovereignty even while openly advocating its surreptitious surrender to unaccountable transnational institutions. “The foundation for U.S. foreign policy in years to come should be ‘Made in North America.’” It adds: “Now is the moment for the United States to break free from old foreign policy biases to recognize that a stronger, more dynamic, resilient continental base will increase U.S. power globally.”

The controversial 137-page CFR report, dubbed North America: Time for a New Focus, was produced by a self-styled “Independent Task Force” chaired by retired U.S. Gen. David Petraeus and former World Bank boss Robert Zoellick, now a bigwig at Goldman Sachs. The two globalists are longtime veterans of the CFR and the even more shadowy Bilderberg summits, which every year bring together some of the leading extremists from around the world in the push for what they call “global governance.”

This summer, Petraeus, who resigned in disgrace from the CIA “killing machine” amid the exposure of an extramarital affair, came under fire for declaring publicly that, “after America, comes North America.” The CFR task force was directed by Shannon K. O'Neil, who serves as a senior fellow in the CFR’s “Latin American Studies” division, which is run by a brazen Castro apologist described by a senior U.S. intelligence officer dealing with Cuba as an “agent of influence” in the United States for the barbaric regime in Havana.

The late Professor Robert Pastor, a CFR operative often described as the “Father of the North American Union,” also served as a member of the task force promoting a continental regime to usurp the sovereignty of Americans, Canadians, and Mexicans. Before he died, Pastor credited The John Birch Society, an affiliate of this magazine, for having killed his radical dream of a European Union-style Leviathan to rule over North America. However, as evidenced by the latest CFR demands on “integration,” the plot to impose a regional super-state on the North American continent is far from dead.

The dubious CFR task force, which appears to have been tasked with formulating politically palatable schemes to assault national sovereignty on the continent, placed special emphasis on energy. Claiming that “North America” could eventually prove to be self-sufficient when it comes to production, the report argued that “continental energy and environmental policies are not keeping up.” Of course, the overwhelming majority of Americans have no idea that there are even “continental energy and environmental policies” — much less whom or what formulates them. But those schemes are expanding nevertheless, though apparently not quickly enough for CFR globalists.
“The North American countries need a regional energy strategy,” the report continues without explicitly acknowledging that “regional” policies require “regional” governance beyond the accountability of domestic voters or constitutions. “The Task Force recommends specific steps to strengthen the continental energy infrastructure (including approval of the Keystone XL pipeline), expand energy exports, support Mexico’s historic reforms, secure safety and encourage harmonized policies to promote energy conservation and lessen carbon costs.”

So-called “harmonized” policies means that government regulations and laws should be the same in each country. Across the European Union, for instance, the overwhelming majority of laws and regulations now originate in Brussels, where voters have virtually no say and out-of-control bureaucrats dictate policy to formerly independent governments. And of course, no globalist report would be complete without demonizing CO2 — exhaled by humans, required for plants, and referred to by scientists as “the gas of life.” So-called “carbon costs” are a manufactured cost, underpinned by discredited theories on “global warming,” aimed at regulating and taxing virtually every human activity while centralizing coercive power at the international level.

Beyond energy, the CFR report shows clearly that the globalists have big plans for their sought-after North American regime. Under the guise of “fostering” what the task force calls a “North American community,” the CFR demanded “comprehensive immigration reform, workforce development, and the creation of a mobility accord to facilitate the movement of workers.” The report also demands that the U.S. Congress pass “comprehensive immigration reforms” — also known as amnesty for illegal immigrants; or as the task force put it, “a pathway to legalization for undocumented immigrants now in the United States.”

“To better aid the movement of North American workers, the three countries should also create a North American Mobility Accord, expand visas for skilled workers, streamline recognition of professional credentials, and develop a regional educational innovation strategy,” the report demands, sounding like what one analyst described to The New American as a “regional Dream Act.” The report seeks to expand on the deeply controversial scheme known as “Beyond the Border,” too — essentially creating what globalists refer to as a “security perimeter” around “North America” while diminishing and eventually abolishing borders for practical purposes within the new “North American” bloc.

The CFR task force also touts “notable opportunities” to “integrate further” in everything from transportation and healthcare — continental ObamaCare, perhaps — to money transfers and border management. Indeed, as was made clear by totalitarians of the last century, healthcare is an especially important component of controlling populations. “The Task Force recognizes the strong cooperation among the three North American countries in preparing the continent for pandemics and health emergencies,” the report says. “It believes the three countries can build on these foundations to integrate and streamline procedures and to ensure the continued health of North Americans.”
The task force also called for a designated U.S. cabinet official to serve as “North American champion,” in addition to new offices at the State Department and the National Security Council to deal exclusively with “North America.” But the process of continental integration — or the surrendering of independence — is already well underway, whether or not Obama has designated his Treasury or State Department bosses as official “champions” of the plot.

“We have shared values,” Petraeus claimed at a New York event unveiling the report, referring to Mexicans, Canadians, and Americans. “I was at a conference in London about two or three months ago, and the question that was posed to me was, after America, what?... I said, after America, North America.” Most Americans would probably not be pleased to know that globalists are quietly plotting their future “after America,” but that is indeed what is happening.

At the same CFR event in New York, neocon Zoellick said “the policy challenge is, how do you get deeper integration, where you have three countries that are very sensitive to their sovereignty? That's different than the European model.” In other words, the “policy challenge” is how to subvert sovereignty against the wishes of the people without arousing too much opposition. With almost 500 million “North Americans,” Zoellick also touted the potential of “a common workforce and human capital” — supposedly something to think about in reference to the globalist-engineered rise of the Communist Chinese dictatorship.

As The New American and other sources have documented extensively, the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, has served as the foundation for continental integration. The same process occurred in Europe with its “European Free Trade Agreement” that eventually became a full-fledged super-state — with globalists deliberately lying to the public every step of the way. Already, North American “tribunals” are purporting to overrule U.S. and state laws and courts as North American bureaucracies increasingly seek to expand their own power and resources. But the CFR wants to go much, much further.

There is one big obstacle to the grandiose plot, however: The people whom the three governments purport to represent. Of course, the authors of the CFR report acknowledge that, for “reasons of history and political culture,” the people of the United States, Canada, and Mexico are all “highly protective of national sovereignty and independence.” So, in light of that fact, the report outlines a wide array of schemes to subvert that national sovereignty and independence without arousing too much alarm or opposition — something globalist schemers have been working on for decades, as revealed in official documents released by WikiLeaks.

As this magazine and the globalists themselves have pointed out, the North American integration plot is merely one component of a much broader strategy in the imposition of what globalists refer to as their “New World Order.” In late August, for example, establishment front-man Henry Kissinger had an excerpt from his book World Order published in the Wall Street Journal. In it, he noted: “The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another.”

That is exactly what is happening around the world as the European Union, the African Union, the Union of South American States, the Eurasian Union, and other regimes continue to usurp the sovereignty, wealth, and liberty of humanity. The globalists have made clear that they intend to eventually try to foist a “North American” parliament, currency, and much more on the people of the continent. If the American people hope to remain free and independent, crushing the radical concept of a “North American” regime must be high on the priority list.