A political deal will be struck to save the Democrat Party from total collapse and protect the Republican Party from revelations of complicity in the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.

 A growing number of Americans are now learning that Barack Obama, according to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution, is an illegal President. The law requires a candidate for the Presidency to be a "natural born citizen," that is, a second generation Am...erican, a U.S. citizen, whose parents were also U.S. citizens at the time of the candidate's birth.
Obama's father was a citizen of Kenya and a British subject at the time of his birth, which made him forever ineligible for the Presidency.

 Practically speaking, that issue is not a problem for Obama because the Republican Party also wants to violate the Constitution. Many Republicans are aggressively advocating Florida Senator Marco Rubio as Mitt Romney's Vice Presidential candidate. Rubio is ineligible because, even though he was born in the United States, his parents were Cuban citizens at the time of his birth.
Since 1975, both Democrat and Republican politicians have been trying unsuccessfully to amend Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution. The election of Obama has allowed them to do so, not legally, but by fait accompli.

 According to the wishes of Democrat and Republican politicians, Anwar al-Awlaki, killed by a drone strike on September 30, 2011, was eligible to be President because he was born in New Mexico of Yemeni parents. Al-Awlaki was the "spiritual leader" of al-Qaida in the Arabian peninsula, whose sermons at the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church, Virginia were attended by two hijackers who carried out the 9/11 attacks, Nawaf al-Hamzi and Hani Hanjour. Likewise, accused Fort Hood shooter and alleged al-Awlaki disciple, Nidal Malik Hasan, is eligible to be President because he was born in Virginia of Palestinian parents.

 

Pelosi to Receive Margaret Sanger Award — But Will It Matter?

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) will receive the Margaret Sanger Award from the Planned Parenthood Federation of America on March 27 at the abortion provider's annual gala event. Not much excitement there. It will do her little good, because those aligned with Planned Parenthood and disposed to regard its founder, the eugenics advocate Sanger, as a heroine are already in Pelosi's corner. And those opposed, including pro-life Republicans and leaders of the Catholic Church, may be counted on to maintain a mysterious sphinx-like silence on the matter.
We in New Hampshire have "been there, done that."

In the year 2000, former U.S. Senator Gordon Humphrey was the Republican candidate for governor of New Hampshire, looking to unseat two-term incumbent Jeanne Shaheen. It was a battle of the undefeated, as neither Humphrey nor Shaheen had ever lost either a primary or general election. Humphrey's problem was overcoming the perception that he was a political “yesterday,” a relic of New Hampshire's solidly Republican past. Humphrey was elected to the Senate in 1978, upsetting veteran Democrat Tom McIntyre with the tagline, "I want to be the toughtest skinflint in the U.S. Senate." He was reelected in the Republican landslide of 1984, then retired after two terms. In 2000 he was running statewide for the first time in 16 years. I recall remarking to him at the time that it must have been a challenge to reconnect with his old supporters.

 

"Yes," he said. "Especially the ones that are dead."
Shaheen, who had fashioned a "moderate" image for herself as a former state senator and two-term governor, managed to keep the focus off wedge issues like abortion, the death penalty, and gun control and on softer, "soccer mom" subjects like providing kindergarten statewide and advancing healthcare for children. Her challenge in 2000 was to portray Humphrey as not only yesterday, but as a dangerously radical yesterday. She had to convince New Hampshire voters that in the not very distant past we had twice elected to the U.S. Senate a flaming right-wing extremist. This, for Shaheen, was old hat. In Shaheen's Abridged Dictionary (SAD), "extremist" is defined as "a Republican running against Jeanne Shaheen." A "non-person,"on the other hand" is a Democrat running against Shaheen, whom she simply ignores and refuses to debate.

Shaheen ran ads playing up the fact that in a previous campaign year, Humphrey had gone to a congressional district in upstate New York to endorse the candidacy of Randall Terry, a frequently jailed anti-abortion activist and founder of Operation Rescue, a group famous for forming human blockades at abortion clinics. In the New Hampshire Union Leader column I was writing at the time, I pointed out that Shaheen had a few years earlier accepted the Margaret Sanger Award from Planned Parenthood, and I included a generous selection of quotes from Sanger to show her advocacy of birth control to eliminate the "unfit" and undesirable and to create a human "race of thoroughbreds." Her ideas included racial and ethnic stereotypes. Negroes were among the people to be weeded out, as were Catholics and others. And the coercive power of the state was not to be neglected. "In case of refusal such persons should have a choice of sterilization or isolation," Sanger said. "Under no circumstances should the state allow such parents to cast their diseased and demented progeny upon society for the normal and fit to provide for."

A grandson of Sanger wrote an op-ed response, published in the Union Leader, and I responded with another column. From there the discussion withered and died. To my knowledge, no Republican mentioned the Sanger/Shaheen connection, nor did any clergy, Catholic or otherwise. Inexplicably, the Humphrey campaign allowed the charges of extremism to run in one direction only, keeping the former senator's campaign on the defensive. Shaheen, the "moderate" eugenicist, won; Humphrey, the pro-life conservative lost, and Republicans have been losing ground in New Hampshire and the nation ever since.

Unless pro-life, pro-family activist Karen Testerman or former U.S. Senator Bob Smith catches electoral lightning in a jar, either former state Sen. Jim Rubens or Scott Brown, the former U.S. senator from Massachusetts, will be facing Shaheen in this year's U.S. Senate race in New Hampshire. Rubens and Brown are both defenders of "abortion rights." Neither is likely to bring up Shaheen's Margaret Sanger Award. The allegedly pro-life party will be too broadminded to take its own side in a fight. The culture of death will win again. And pro-life Republicans will be betrayed once again.

The Center for Security Policy’s report, Shariah Law and American State Courts: An Assessment of State Appellate Court Cases evaluates 50 Appellate Court cases from 23 states that involve conflicts between Shariah (Islamic law) and American state law.

These cases are the stories of Muslim American families, mostly Muslim women and children, who were asking American courts to preserve their rights to equal protection and due process.  These families came to America for freedom from the discriminatory and cruel laws of Shariah.  When our courts then apply Shariah law in the lives of these families, and deny them equal protection, they are betraying the principles on which America was founded.

The study’s findings suggest that Shariah law has entered into state court decisions, in conflict with the Constitution and state public policy. Some commentators have said there are no more than one or two cases of Shariah law in U.S. state court cases; yet we found 50 significant cases just from the small sample of appellate published cases.

1.  WILL SHARIA LAW RULE?

2.  SHARIA  LAW:  Definition -

3.  TAQIYYA: 

4.  ABROGATION: 

5.  DHIMMITUDE: 

6.  OKLAHOMA'S  BAN  ON  SHARIA  LAW STRUCK  DOWN: 

7.  THE  FUTURE  OF  TERRORISM: 

8.  SEVEN  PHASES

9.  PHASE  1 - THE  AWAKENING: 

10. PHASE 2 - OPENING  EYES: 

11. PHASE  3 - ARISING  AND  STANDING  UP: 

12. PHASE  4 - GOVERNMENTS  COLLAPSE: 

13. PHASE  5 - GLOBAL  ISLAMIC  STATE: 

14. PHASE  6 - TOTAL  CONFRONTATION: 

15. PHASE 7 - DEFINITIVE  VICTORY: 

 

American law-vs- sharia Law with the Colonel

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/sisterthundershow/2014/03/24/american-law-vs-sharia-law-with-the-colonel

French Jewish Teacher Has Nose Broken & Swastika Drawn on Chest by Muslims

On Thursday, a brutal assault against a French Jew occurred in Paris. A French Jewish teacher had his nose broken by a group of Muslims, cursing at him in Arabic. Anti-semitism is so horrible in France that two-thirds of French Jews are wanting to leave. Who is the main culprit behind anti-Semitic actions in France and all of Europe? Naturally, the culprit is Islam. Dr. Michael Evans reported in November 2013, "Islam is replacing Christianity in Europe. Churches across the continent have been razed to make way for mosques." Prepare for another Holocaust because it is coming. Assaults, rapes, murder, and any other form of horror directed at Jews will come from the Islamic invasion of Europe.

A French Jewish teacher from Paris told police that three men had assaulted and cursed him in Arabic before drawing a swastika on his chest.
       The attack occurred on Thursday night, according to a report by the Drancy-based Bureau for National Vigilance Against Anti-Semitism, a watchdog group known as BNVCA.

The French Jewish teacher was attacked by Muslims. According to Daniel Greenfield, the Muslim population in Marseille, France stands at 40 percent. This particular French city is the most dangerous city in all of Europe. The Muslim immigration problem affects all of France. With the influx, comes mayhem and death. Is there any wonder why French Jews seek a mass exodus? People's very lives are at stake. This is a snapshot of multicultural Europe, and America as Muslim immigrants come and conquer, while everyone sits back and watches.

The attackers - who shouted "death to the Jews" and "filthy Jew" during the assault - broke the victim's nose and drew a swastika on his chest after tearing open his shirt.
“One of the perpetrators opened the victim’s shirt and with a black marker drew a swastika on the man’s bare chest,” BNVCA president Sammy Ghozlan wrote in the BNVCA report, according to JTA.

It is Nazi Germany meets Islam in 2014 France. Swastika's, shouting obscenities, and assaults of Jews by Muslims using Nazi symbols is the joining of the most horrific events of the past, with the present day atrocities of Islam. It is a match made in Hell, and one that will never leave. The remnants of Hitler linger in Islam, a reminder that the past is never truly gone, but surely to repeat itself.

The victim, who was wearing a kippah at the time of the attack, was identified as K. Richard. He was treated for a broken nose and lacerations on his face on Thursday night.

He told police that the three men whoa attacked him appeared to be of North African descent and were in their twenties. They cornered him as he was exiting a kosher restaurant on Manin Street in Paris’ 19th arrondissement, near the Gare du Nord train station.

The perpetrators were Islamists of North African descent. Muslim immigrants have taken over France, and no one, especially Jews, are safe. There will be more beatings and assaults, like the French Jewish teacher as time goes on. There is no stopping what is coming. It is too late to turn back the tide of Muslim immigration in France, or anywhere else in Europe. All Jews in Europe should have an exit plan. Sickeningly, Obama's America is denying Jewish visas, but the Muslim Brotherhood gets VIP treatment. America will not help European Jews escape. They'll be left to fend for themselves against attacks by Islamic thugs, like the French Jewish teacher.

Richard’s cries for help drew the attention of a passerby. The perpetrators fled as he approached, the report read.

BNVCA has recorded a spate of anti-Semitic incidents in France in recent weeks.

On Wednesday, the two-year anniversary of the murder of four Jews in Toulouse, the president of the local Jewish community encouraged young Jews to leave France.

Arie Bensemhoun, the community’s president, said young Jews should leave Toulouse because they could not practice Judaism openly and without fear there.

“I won’t deny that, yes, I encourage the younger people to make aliyah [immigrate to Israel] or go elsewhere, where they can thrive in open Judaism, emancipated and without constantly fearing over what tomorrow will bring,” Bensemhoun said.

French Jews should leave France. Islam has taken over. If French Jews cannot practice their religion openly, they have no option but to flee. Sickeningly, anti-Semitic sentiment is not singularly Muslim, but it is an ever present force of evil that will not go away.

Many ascribe the migration to Europe’s economic problems and the rising specter of anti-Semitism and anti-Jewish violence in France. … Recent findings by the European Union’s Fundamental Rights Agency indicated that a third of Jews from several Western European countries were considering emigration due to anti-Semitism….

France is under siege, as is the entire world. The Islamic invasion of Europe is to blame for the cultural nightmare that is Europe. When the next Holocaust comes, will the leaders of Europe and America stand up to the truth that multiculturalism is the cause? It's doubtful, because they are the problem.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/03/french-jewish-teacher-has-nose-broken-by-muslims-swastika-drawn-on-chest/#VdjzHIzmzOoF0sSR.99

89% of Veneto residents vote for independence from Rome

Over 89 percent of residents in Italy's Veneto region have voted in an unofficial referendum in favor of independence from the rest of the country as Venetians seek to restore the glory of the old days by creating a state of their own.
Over two million residents of Veneto – the region of Italy surrounding Venice – took part in the so-called 'Veneto independence referendum' that lasted from Sunday to Friday. The survey, conducted online and backed by the region’s independence parties, has no legal power but aims to gather support for a bill calling for a referendum.
The poll also asked residents if they want the region to keep the euro and remain part of the European Union and NATO if it declares its independence. More than 55 percent of voters said they would prefer an independent Veneto to remain part of the EU, and over 51 percent said they want to remain in the eurozone. Over 64.5 percent said they want Veneto to be part of NATO.
The results of the vote were announced Friday in the city of Treviso, where hundreds of pro-independence activists gathered for a demonstration, waving the flags of the old Venetian Republic.
Earlier, the "yes" campaign – organized by pro-independence activists – said that if the majority voted for separation of the region, Veneto would issue a 'Declaration of Veneto Sovereignty' and stop all tax transfers to the central government in Rome.
Though opponents described the poll on Twitter as "total madness," supporters believe in a new, independent Republic of Veneto. They say the region would be inspired by the ancient Republic of Venice – a rich economic, cultural, and trading state known as “La Serenissima,” or “The Most Serene Republic of Venice.” The republic lost its independence when Napoleon conquered Venice in 1797.
Earlier in March, leaders of the independence movement said they were not going to wait for Rome’s approval, adding that they would begin the separation process if the population voted in favor of the move.
Veneto's President Luca Zaia – who supports the independence movement – said the region is tired of the lack of respect from Rome.

The president of the Veneto region, Luca Zaia gives a press conference on the vote for the independence of the region, on March 19, 2014 in Rome. (AFP Photo / Alberto Pizzoli)

Members of the movement for Veneto independence say they were inspired by Scotland and Catalonia, both of which have also planned referendums for 2014. Scotland will vote on its independence in September, while Catalonia’s residents will take part in a similar vote in November. According to a Thursday online poll taken among Catalonia residents, nearly 59.6 percent of its population desires independence from the rest of Spain.
Independence supporters say Italy's economy is the key reason behind the bid, as Veneto is one of the wealthiest and most industrialized regions of the country.
“Veneto is the region that has been supporting financially Italy and the main reason [for separation from Italy] is economics,” Lodovico Pizzati, spokesman for the Veneto independence movement, told RT.
“We pay 70 billion euros in taxes to the Italian state and only a fraction comes back, so we’re looking at a gap of 20 billion euros."
Professor of history Paolo Bernardini explained that Veneto, as well as Milan and Lombardy, are stranded by the fiscal pressure coming from Rome.
“Venice pretty much as Milan and Lombardy are strangled by the Italian fiscal pressure, which is well above 60 percent, occasionally 70 percent. So it’s one of the strongest fiscal pressures in the world,” he told RT.
“By creating a new little and efficient state, we would reduce the fiscal pressure on the citizens and at the same time we would regain the independence of the city of Venice which was a beacon of European civilization until 1797, when it was closed by Napoleon.”

Very little coverage on the attacks on Christians by Muslims in other countries.
Obama said, "Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance."
Yeah; put that in the:
Lies Told By Obama category.
If that began to happen here in the US; there would be a bloodbath.
But The United States government seems rather silent.
Yet they keep giving aid; for which they get very little back on their investment.
- Glenn

March 22nd – The schools won’t do it so Rush Limbaugh is giving children a proud and unapologetic look at American history. And to the dismay of Rush bashers everywhere, kids are loving it! His first book, “Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrim...s: Time-Travel Adventures with Exceptional Americans,” immediately skyrocketed to the top of the NY Times Bestsellers List. His second, “Rush Revere and the First Patriots,” has done exactly the same. That’s bad enough for libs, but adding insult to injury the Children’s Book Council has announced Limbaugh is a finalist for Children’s Book Author of the Year. The best part is that it’s the kids who vote. But that’s not stopping many on the left from screaming “Unfair!” because of Limbaugh’s existing fan base. Boo Hoo! The books are well researched, funny and heaven forbid, patriotic. As one commenter put it: “Rush may wind up doing a better job educating America's youth on the history of this country than billions of dollars spent through the so called Department of Education ever have.” “Mega-Dittos” to that!