United Nations Treaty Compromises Parents’ Rights to Their
Children
Senate vote to ratify coming before end of year
Congress is considering signing a United Nations treaty that
the mass media is not discussing. This treaty, called the United Nations
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), is up for
discussion and will likely go to the Senate for a vote in early December.
While some members of the House of Representatives oppose
this convention/treaty, it appears that an overwhelming majority of the Senate
strongly favors it. President Obama has also voiced his approval. Last August,
while speaking at the Disabled Veterans National Conference in Orlando,
Florida, he said:
… I know how disappointing it was last year when the Senate
failed to approve the disabilities treaty despite the fact that we had a former
senator and World War II veteran, Bob Dole, in the Senate chamber. But we’re gonna keep fighting to ratify that
treaty…It’s the right thing to do. We’re
gonna get it done.
Read the Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities (UNCRPD).
The UNCRPD appears to be an innocuous document, but is
worded in such a way that if disabled individuals, including children, are not
afforded their right to communicate, reproduce, and learn, in the way the
States Parties deem best, the States Parties can intervene and take control.
Of primary concern is the fact that once Congress signs the
UNCRPD, it will be much easier for Congress to get the United Nations
Convention on the Rights of the Child signed.
Read the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the
Child.
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
(‘convention’ is another name for ‘treaty’) was designed by the United Nations
in 1989 to protect children in war-torn, poverty-stricken countries where
conditions are notoriously horrific and children are routinely abused.
If signed, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
would strip American parents of the right to use their own judgment to decide
what their child should be allowed to do, watch, attend, learn, read, or share
with others; and would instead guarantee the child the freedom to make those
very adult decisions for him/herself with only an official document and the
United Nations as guiding forces.
Moreover, the U.N. would guarantee our children a lot more
freedom than parents may allow them. Consider that according to the UN
Convention on the Rights of the Child, anyone under 18 is guaranteed freedom
from “interference with his or her privacy…or correspondence” [Article 16
UNCRC], the freedom to assemble and the freedom of asssociation, [Article 15]
and the freedom to “seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all
kinds…through…any media of the child’s choice” [Article 13 UNCRC]. These are
only a few of the freedoms the United Nations sees fit to guarantee American
children.
Because according to our Constitution all treaties signed by
the United States supersede our Constitution [Article 6], a signed treaty
immediately becomes the law of the land even if it takes away some of the
freedoms the Constitution guarantees.
Read the U.S. Constitution.
Signing treaties is a way for Congress to quietly change the
Constitution without the American public being aware it’s happening.
For example, did you know that the Senate very nearly passed
the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on
December 4, 2012? Of the 100 Senators in Congress, 61 voted to ratify this
treaty which hands to the United Nations the power to dictate how the disabled
in our country should be treated. With each U.N. convention signed we give the
United Nations a greater say in how our country should function.
See how your senator voted on the UNCRPD on December 4,
2012.
While none of us would say that we agree with each and every
decision made by every member of Congress and our President, we elected those
people. What if we were to hand over our power to leaders we do not and cannot
elect? And how Congress votes now will affect how much freedom we have to raise
our children and grandchildren in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment