Tuesday, January 7, 2014

PHONY CONSERVATIVE LEADERSHIP MORE DANGEROUS THAN LIBERALS !
     Hundreds of books have been written on this subject; however, when the information is from the actual "findings" of a U.S. House Committee investigation, Congressional Records, the UN Chronicle and other Congressional reports it would be quite impossible for anybody, even including Rush Limbaugh, to refute it, wouldn't it?  Rush says the CFR is "just a social club for rich people".  Many of us know that the controllers of the tax-exempt foundations are the common thread linking the hundreds of non-governmental organizations responsible for the gradual (and today not-so-gradual) loss of our freedom in America as a result of a long string of continued violations of our Constitution.
      To some extent we're hapless victims of the insidiously cunning and covert methods used by the self-proclaimed world policymakers and their thousands of foundations, commissions, councils, agencies, clubs, along with the NGOs, colleges, communications systems and other foundation-funded institutions, organizations and corporations.  Maybe, though, the most dangerous of all are the organizations whose leaders claim to be pro-American, Christian, conservative and grass roots. 
     Millions of us, who over the years knew no better, financially supported and trustingly followed leaders of the hundreds of phony conservative organizations which were established by the pawns of the internationalists back in the '70's.  They called themselves then "The New Right" and said, "We're ready to lead".  Today they are labeled by the controlled media the "Christian Right".  These organizations, by all appearances were created to gain control of the true grass roots movement against the internationalist's take-over of America, and too many of us fell for them.  You will find a majority of the leaders of these organizations on the membership list of the Council for National Policy.
     If you doubt the "New Right" organizations are phony - ask yourself this one simple question:  "After 30 years, with millions of active members donating hundreds of millions of dollars and nearly every spare hour of their time... why, under the 'New Right' leadership, is America on the brink of disaster?"  Republicans and Democrats, conservatives and liberals - it makes no difference today.  Most in places of power in our government have been placed there by the power brokers who were exposed by Congressman Reece and the subsequent book, discussed earlier in this report, Foundations.  The counterfeit Christian conservatives leaders are working with and for the power brokers.  Think about it... what better way to defeat your opposition than to create and lead your own opposition?  It is rightly called CONTROLLED OPPOSITION
"IT IS IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION... AND WHAT ARE CALLED THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, THAT THE GREATEST DAMAGE CAN BE DONE TO OUR SOCIETY"     pg. xiii - "Foundations"
     The foundations, and most especially the Carnegie Endowment, have greatly influenced our American educational system and many of the "conservative" leaders are aiding and abetting the process of "Moving the Nation Educationally to a 'New World Order" . In the conclusion of his research manual, America 2000 / Goals 2000, which explains the restructuring of our education system, Rev. James R. Patrick says,
"...we are really dealing with an international agenda to formulate and bring into being a single world government. What I find to be so fascinating is that the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission play such a dominant role... It is a total restructure of our society to create an international / global community... In addition to the very liberal agenda they postulate, it appears they have a significant influence on the conservative viewpoint. In fact, one of the main planks of the entire program is.....
.....'CHOICE IN EDUCATION'." - VOUCHERS
     Rev. Patrick explains that choice involves the placing of federal funds in the form of vouchers to bring about the merger of private, parochial, and Christian schools with the public sector. This will eliminate all 'freedom of choice' as the two are merged into a single nationalistic educational program that will then comfortably merge with the international effort. He says that some of the more conservative voices are a part of the very group that seems to be moving us away from national sovereignty.
     For instance, former Secretary of Education William Bennett has blasted much of the educational system. He has shown it to be a failure and has called upon a renewal of old-fashioned family values... "but he is an active participant of the restructure movement. He, in truth, has a heavy influence on James Dobson, Pat Robertson, Phyllis Schlafly and the leaders of the Christian school movement, all of whom have pushed for the passage of a voucher bill...."
Rev. Patrick asks,
"Is it possible that the very people who are working to establish a single world government have both a 'liberal' and a 'conservative' voice to manipulate and control both sides so they win... regardless of the party or office?"
     He claims it is not only possible, but it appears that is exactly what is happening.  He points out the uncanny similarity in the political and economic agenda of every administration since Roosevelt (the beginning of the New Deal / Socialism, CFR influence, and the United Nations in America) and most blatantly, the total restructuring of the educational program. He says the only thing that has changed in the educational program is the name - - from "AMERICA 2000" to "GOALS 2000" - from Bush to Clinton - Republican to Democrat - conservative to liberal.
     According to the Reece investigation, the National Education Association (NEA) is a foundation-supported organization. The Reece Committee Report said of the Carnegie Endowment's work... "An extremely powerful propaganda machine was created."  It spent many millions of dollars in mass production of material, creation and support of numerous international policy clubs and local organizations at colleges, collaboration with newspaper editors and school book publishers, establishment of professorships at colleges, training and indoctrination of teachers, etc.  Although the Endowment frequently used terms such as the "education of public opinion", Reece maintained it was not public education but "molding public opinion".  Further the report said, "No private group should have the power or the right to decide what should be read and taught in our schools and colleges".
     It seems impossible to believe that Limbaugh, Bennett, Kemp, Robertson, Dobson, Schlafly, Larry Pratt, Howard Phillips, Paul Weyrich, Wayne LaPierre and all of the other leaders of "conservative" organizations don't know what so many of us know.  To give them the benefit of the doubt, we hope you will all see to it they receive this information along with the related document packet and call upon their full support for America's sovereignty and Americans' freedom once and for all.
     To reiterate and to put it simply, we Americans have been living under the Grand Illusion created for us by the money, power and influence of the tax free foundations that... "Ya can't fight City Hall.  It's a law!"  These thoughtless, careless and complacent attitudes have brought us to a pivotal crossroad. Maybe the stand that Michael New has taken will become the catalyst to change the deadly direction in which America is headed.  If we don't, America does not deserve Michael New and we will get what we deserve.
[Note - 1-17-2000 - The following is added for your further confirmation of the at-odds motives of the Phony Conservative leaders... excerpts from an article on Allen Gottlieb, long-time CNP member, titled, The Merchant of Fear, by Jim Halpin and Paul de Armond - 1994, 1995
". . . A member of the board of governors on the powerful and ultra-secretive Council for National Policy. . . Membership is secret but is known to include such familiar right wing stalwarts as CNP president, Former Attorney General Edwin Meese, Paul Weyrich, founding president of the Heritage Foundation, Jerry Falwell and Oliver North.
In Trashing the Economy, the 1993 book he and his co-author, CDFE Vice President Ron Arnold write with startling frankness that:
'The message of the direct mail letter must appeal to three base emotions; Fear, Hate and Revenge...
[The] fund raising mailer must present you with a crisis -- a problem won't do... That crisis must frighten you... If you are not frightened, you won't send money...
Then the direct mail letter must present you with a bogeyman against whom to focus your anger...
Once you've been frightened and made to hate the bogeyman, the successful direct mail appeal must offer you a way to get revenge against the bogeyman -- the payoff for your contribution. The more soul-satisfying the revenge, the better the letter pulls.
All this must be dressed up in an appeal that appears to have a high moral tone, but which -- without you realizing it -- works on your lower emotions."
     Gottlieb and Arnold are describing environmental direct-mail pitches but Arnold in an interview on Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise, also told us that "in direct mail, fear, hate and revenge go a long way."
     Gottlieb's letters may be blunt, but they work.  He says he mails out 25 million direct-response letters every year and that recipients mail back $24 million.  His costs, at 27 cents per letter, are $6.75 million, which means his mailers net $17.25 million. Put another way, $2.25 comes back for each dollar invested in direct response letters. Gottlieb may have had these figures in mind the time he told a reporter that, "All I have to do is turn the spigot on and the money just flows." [end excerpt]
 Recall letters you've received from the various conservative / Christian-conservative organizations.  Do they contain the requisite "bogeyman fear, hate and revenge factors to open the money spigot"?
"HE HAS SWORN TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION, BUT ALSO TO TAKE ORDERS FROM THE PRESIDENT ON DOWN."
     The above statement was made in a Washington Times (9-1-95) article, which also stated... "Retired Army Col. Robert Maginnis, an analyst at the conservative Family Research Council, said Spc. New has no legal standing to refuse the order."  Spec. New said he voiced his objection to superiors and stated, "no one can explain to me why I am supposed to wear somebody else's uniform.  Basically I have questions that no one is willing to answer."
     Consider thoughtfully and seriously all of the aforementioned information.  According to the Supreme Court, unConstitutional law is NO Law.  If the Supreme Court ever rules otherwise, we assert that their ruling would be unConstitutional.  Therefore, we must assume that every law passed by the U.S. Congress or by any State Legislative body which violates this Constitution, any charter ratified by the U.S. Senate which poses to be the "supreme law of our land", any military rule or regulation, any contract unsuspecting Americans have entered into by coercion under *color of law - such law, treaty or contract is null and void, "... by the declaration, that the Constitution is the supreme law."
* [color of law - "That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit, feigned, having the appearance of truth." Black's Law, 6th - "That which presents an appearance which does not correspond with the reality, or an appearance intended to conceal or to deceive." "Mere semblance of legal right." Barron's Law Dictionary 3rd]
     According to a recent communication we received, Colonel Ronald Ray, USMCR (ret.) and former Asst. Sec. of Defense under president Reagan says New is on firm Constitutional ground to refuse to change his allegiance. Ray is quoted as saying [unconfirmed by CDR] "There are serious legal questions yet unanswered, not the least of which is the status of soldiers who fall into enemy hands." "... are unprotected by the Geneva Conventions.  Questions like these need to be resolved before you force a man into a war zone."
     We hope Colonel Ray is not insinuating that simply enacting some new regulation to afford protection for UN troops under the Geneva Convention would justify "forcing a man into a war zone".  We assert - and invite all Americans to stand with us - that Spec. Michael New is protected by this Constitution for the united States of America - and by his declaration of such... along with all of his fellow Americans declaring the same.
     Spec. Michael New took a stand for America.  The army says "For now he is not subject to disciplinary action because he has only voiced opposition. The pivotal moment will come when he is ordered to wear the UN uniform and join his colleagues deploying to Macedonia... in late October." Continuing from the Washington Times, "The Uniformed Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) requires military personnel to obey lawful orders.  The Army considers orders to join the international task force in Macedonia to be lawful".  The evidence in this article proves the Army is wrong.
     Considering so many of our high military leaders, Clinton's State Department appointees and U.S. Congressmen and Senators are members of the infamous Council on Foreign Relations; considering the United Nations is NOT a Peacekeeping Organization but rather a Warmaking Global Corporation wanna-be World Parliamentary Government controlled by rich-beyond-our-imaginations lunatics who actually believe they are qualified and have the prerogative to "organize life on the planet"; considering the UN was foisted upon America and the world by the use of billions of our own hard-earned dollars and which buys its brainless puppets to perpetrate the globalist plans; considering these lunatics use the media to "shape the future of this nation and of mankind in the image of its [their] own value concepts" - would we dare to let down?  Give up?
     Should American soldiers have to obey the orders of a president who violates the Constitution at every turn? or his "superiors" who pay allegiance to the puppet-masters?  Should they be subjected to any court in this country or in the UN-created World Court?  Most importantly will we, as still-free Americans, stand with and honor any brave man's unwillingness to forfeit his God-given right to say NO?  Let's all SAY "NO TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER".  We Americans must recognize that our heritage of freedom and liberty under this Constitution is being eroded piece by piece to be replaced by the tyrannical "rule of men" under the UN Charter.  We must decide now (and with God all things are possible) which future we will choose for ourselves and our posterity.
     The truth is we've had it too easy for too long, and we've taken for granted that this Constitution would protect our freedom.  It's time we all accept our responsibility for the state of our nation and do all within our power to recapture the American dream. . . OUR dream, not a globalist nightmare.  Our Constitution lives only in the declaration of its supremacy.  If each one of us will accept full responsibility for our present situation, ask our heavenly Father for guidance and be willing to place the outcome in His hands - we can expect miracles.
WHAT CAN YOU DO?
 
     We've prepared a document packet which includes copies of nearly all of the resource material and newspaper articles to which we've referred in this article and have added documents over the past few years.  It is foolish to blindly believe, or expect others to believe, information from a book or newsletter.  It is impossible, without documentation, to convince most uninformed people that the information herein is the truth and a root cause of the demise of American freedom. Therefore, we urge you to get the related document packet.
     Since those who occupy positions in the federal branch of our government, including the U.S. Congress, have been taking secret orders from the global elite for over a century; since the right to self-government inherently remains with we, the people, who elect officials within our respective states to act as fiduciary (state legislators); since the power of the states has been usurped by the federal government its agencies and agents only by the acquiescence of elected state government officials, the power can be reclaimed by we, the people, working through our local and state governments.  This information is useless unless we get it into the hands of our elected state legislators and local elected officials.  As our representatives they have a responsibility to assert States' sovereignty by declaring the supremacy of the Constitution; to protect their constituents from further federal encroachment and begin the reversal process - to BRING THE POWER BACK TO THE STATES... BACK TO THE PEOPLE.
     The message should be... loud and clear... Get the UN out of America and get America out of the UN! Get all foreign troops off our soil and bring our American military personnel home!  Get rid of all government appointees who are CFR or TC members and pass a law that forbids elected officials to hold membership in those or ANY organization which promotes American "Interdependence" in their damned Global Neighborhood.  Get state laws passed rejecting - as unConstitutional - all self-destructive agreements (treaties) including the NAFTA and GATT/WTO.  Use your own initiative to interact with your state officials and lets stop the insanity once and for all.

No comments:

Post a Comment