UNITED NATIONS UNLAWFULLY HEADQUARTERED IN AMERICA

     According to World Book Encyclopedia (1973), the first session of the UN General Assembly (G.A.) was held in London (1946), at which time the decision was made to base its headquarters in America.  John D. Rockefeller donated $8.5 million for the purchase of 18 acres along the East River in New York and the city donated additional land.  In '47 the G.A. approved plans for the buildings and in '48 the US approved an interest-free loan of $65 million for construction of the building. 

     How is it, we wonder, that the American people have been stuck with the greatest share of expenses of the UN?  Nearly every country in the world today are members of the UN and we pay over one-third of the expenses. "From those according to their ability..."? (a familiar UN - Communist buzz-phrase)

     From the Congressional Record, 12-11-67... Absence of UN Headquarters site Agreement. On 12-11-67, during a debate in the Senate, Senator Strom Thurmond was objecting to our UN Ambassador, Mr. Goldberg (cfr), bringing Viet Cong onto American soil.  He said,

"...the State Department position is that we are obliged by law to allow the Vietcong to come.  There is one serious weakness in the State Department position. For 20 years, the State Department and the United Nations have diligently promulgated the myth that an agreement exists between the US and the UN, pursuant to law, governing the relationships arising out of the UN's headquarters being located within the US.  That agreement was never consummated."

     Senator Thurmond explained as follows:  On 6-26-47, Sec. of State George Marshall (cfr) and UN Secretary-General , Trygvie Lie signed a draft agreement regarding the headquarters' site. The draft was submitted to the US Senate which amended the resolution (SJRes 144) to protect US immigration laws.  The House further amended and strengthened the Senate's amendments. President Truman signed SJRes 144 consisting of the original draft and five amendments which became Public Law 357 on 8-4-47.  The UN approved the draft agreement of 6-26-47, with no reference to PL 357 or its amendments.  Thurmond said to further confuse matters, all subsequent UN documents were printed using the original draft agreement - totally ignoring the law passed by the US Congress.

     In the Congressional Record on 12-13-67 Senator Thurmond mentions a Washington Post article which claimed the State Department denied Thurmond's facts.  Thurmond points out he used documents from Senate Internal Security Commission.  He said, "Nevertheless, the State Department has consistently pretended that both parties to the agreement have accepted all terms, even though no legal action nor official correspondence exists to supply substance to the illusion."  To date we have found no documents which refute Senator Thurmond's findings.  Nor have we been able to verify that the $65 million interest-free loan to the UN was ever paid. The US State Department, dominated for decades by the Council on Foreign Relations, establishes America's foreign policy. Doesn't this explain the continuity of our foreign policy regardless of the political party in power?  CFR members, under the tutelage of their masters of global governance, have been leading America down "The Hard Road to World Order", and we've almost arrived at their designated destination.

IS THE UNITED NATIONS' BILL OF RIGHTS THE PLANNED WORLD CONSTITUTION?

     The Charter of the United Nations was drafted at the San Francisco Conference in 1945. By examining its founding documents one can readily see the evidence of the degree of communist/socialist influence in its creation.  Its International Bill of Rights combines four covenants as described in the Introduction...

"Four major United Nations legal instruments exist to define and to guarantee the protection of human rights." These are:

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966), International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) and the Optional Protocol to the latter.

Compare just a few of the UN "rights" with our Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights.  The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) was ratified by the U.S. Senate April 2, 1992 by unrecorded voice vote.

     In the ICCPR Art. 18, Sec.1: "Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion.... "  Sec. 3: "Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law..."

Art. 19, Sec. 2:  "Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression..." Sec. 3:  "The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary... for the protection of national security."

Art. 21,  "The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognized.  No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security... "

Art. 23, 4.  "States Parties to the present Covenant shall take appropriate steps to ensure equality of rights and responsibilities of spouses as to marriage... In the case of dissolution, provision shall be made for the necessary protection of any children."

Art. 24, 2.  "Every child shall be registered immediately after birth and shall have a name." [and a number.  The above excerpts perfectly describe Marxism]

     The Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions funded by the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations has drafted a Constitution for the World and a proposed Constitution for the NewStates of America.  The language in these documents is very similar to that of the UN Treaty excerpted above.  There are no rights - just privileges and always with exceptions. Remember - the same people whose power and money established the UN, funded the creation of these "new" constitutions, and unless we take a stand here and now, for Michael New and our Constitution, we will be living in their global nightmare.

     Although they vehemently deny the fact, the world policy makers intend to establish a global government via the United Nations.  To substantiate this assertion, from just one of many UN documents... UN Chronicle - March, 1993...

"The General Assembly is facing an historic challenge to truly become a functional world parliament on the basis of the United Nations Charter".

     In a 1950 US Senate report on Resolutions Relative to Revision of the United Nations Charter, Atlantic Union, World Federation, Etc. pg. 494 James P. Warburg (cfr), grandson of Federal Reserve founder, Paul Warburg (cfr) testified as follows:

"... the great question of our time is not whether or not one world can be achieved, but whether or not one world can be achieved by peaceful means.  We shall have world government, whether or not we like it.  The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest."