The documentary, filmed by the BBC, proved what had long been suspected: that Sharia courts... routinely issue rulings according to Sharia law that are at odds with British law.The British government has launched a public consultation on whether or not to introduce student loans that are compliant with Islamic Sharia law, which forbids loans that involve the payment of interest.
Paragraph 2.3 of the guidelines of the Law Society of Britain suggests that Sharia law could overrule British law in inheritance disputes.
Critics say the controversy is just the latest example of how the British legal and financial systems are being steadily transformed to comply with Sharia law.
The move to seek input from the general public comes amid rising complaints from Muslim students, who argue that the existing interest-based student loan system is unfairly forcing them to choose between getting a university degree and staying true to their religious beliefs.
The government says the establishment of a scheme that would enable Muslim students to finance their degrees in a way that complies with Islamic principles would "ensure that anyone with the ability and desire can go to university."
![]()
"I want London to stand alongside Dubai and Kuala Lumpur as one of the great capitals of Islamic finance anywhere in the world." — UK Prime Minister David Cameron addressing the World Islamic Economic Forum in London on October 29, 2013. (Image source: 10 Downing St. Facebook page)
|
Critics counter that the dispute over interest-bearing student loans follows stepped-up demands for Sharia-compliant banking and insurance as well as credit cards, mortgages and pension funds, which—taken together—are contributing to the establishment of parallel Islamic financial and legal systems in Britain.
The consultation—formally known as the Consultation on a Sharia-Compliant Alternative Finance Product—seeks to determine whether an "alternative finance system that is not interest based" would be acceptable to "anyone who might be deterred from the conventional system."
The alternative financial model involves a mutual fund pooling scheme (known as takaful in Arabic), whereby prospective students would withdraw money from a Sharia-compliant fund to pay for school. Upon graduation they would make a series of repayments back into the same fund to help pay for the education of other students who come along after them.
In an effort to address concerns that Muslim students would end up paying less than non-Muslims, the government says the fund would be set up in such a way so as to ensure that repayments are made at the same rate as students who take out traditional student loans.
The government's consultation document says "this model of student finance product was proposed and developed by experts in Islamic finance and has been approved by the Sharia Supervisory Committee of the Islamic Bank of Britain." It continues:
The model's underlying principle is one of communal interest and transparent sharing of benefit and obligation, with the repayments of students participating in the fund being used to provide finance to future students who select to join the fund. This ensures that all members of the fund benefit equally from it.The consultation—which was unveiled on April 3 and will run until June 12—is in response to pressure from several Muslim lobbying groups who argue that sweeping government reforms to higher education that came into effect in September 2012 are discriminatory against Muslim students.
Students participating in the fund would not be borrowing money and paying it back with interest to a third party, which would not be compliant with Sharia law. Instead, the Takaful fund will be established with an initial amount of money that can be donated to the fund or on the basis of Qard Hasan (interest-free loan) and based on a concept of mutual participation and guarantee.
Students will obtain finance from the fund by applying in a similar manner to the conventional loan. The contract will be based upon a unilateral promise guaranteeing that they will repay a Takaful contribution—which is perceived as a charitable contribution from a Sharia perspective for the benefit of the members of the fund. Monies will be released once the contract is signed. Repayment will be made to the fund once they are in employment and earning above the repayment threshold, which would be set at the same level as for traditional student loans.
The reforms—aimed at improving the financial sustainability of the British university system by shifting the financial burden from taxpayers to graduates—tripled the cap on tuition fees to £9,000 ($15,000; €11,000). The new system also requires graduates who earn above £21,000 ($35,000) to pay interest on student loans of up to 3 percent above inflation.
The London-based Federation of Student Islamic Societies (FOSIS) says the requirement to pay interest on student loans is unacceptable for the estimated 115,000 Muslim university students in Britain.
In an interview with The Independent, a FOSIS spokesman said: "Under Islamic law interest is seen as something that is prohibited. Previously, the interest rate was at the market rate of inflation. The problem now is that the interest is above the market rate. Because the rate of interest is above the rate of inflation, it is quite blatant usury."
FOSIS says it knows of many Muslim students have who decided against going to university because of the new system of student loan repayments.
Another group called First Ethical Charitable Trust has launched an advocacy campaign— "Lobbying for a Halal Alternative to Student Loans"—aimed at pressuring the government to introduce Sharia-compliant student loans. The group's website states:
In our view, there are thousands of Muslim students, each and every year, who are effectively being denied access to a university education because of the current interest based system of student loans.The group says it welcomes the government's "promising, yet long overdue step" but complains that "it will take 3-4 years before an alternative model becomes a reality, not only because of the need to pass legislation, but also because they need to then carry out a feasibility study, and properly test an alternative model. We think this is way too long and will leave many Muslim students stranded in the interim."
Given Islam strictly prohibits both the paying and receiving of interest, many Muslim students face a conflict between funding their university course through taking a government backed interest-bearing loan and practicing their faith. As a result, thousands choose to forgo the massive benefits a university education can confer.
Denying these principled young people access to university is an incredibly short sighted policy which will condemn tens of thousands of practicing Muslims to permanently lower career and life opportunities, hence storing up social cohesion and equality issues for decades to come.
Others complain the government is creating a scheme that is only superficially avoiding interest and thus is not actually Sharia-compliant.
Sheikh Suhaib Hasan, a Muslim hardliner who runs the UK Islamic Sharia Council, is quoted by The Independent as saying: "By limiting the repayments to a benchmark similar to that of conventional bank interest rates, Sharia-compliant schemes I think are nothing but a smokescreen through which a prohibited matter turns into a permitted one, so it's better to leave it as it is."
Meanwhile, young Muslims interviewed by The Guardian are indifferent to the government's initiative and say they do not see the point in Sharia-compliant student loans.
Critics say the controversy over student loans is just the latest example of how the British financial and legal systems are being steadily transformed to comply with Sharia law.
In March 2014, it emerged that Islamic law is to be effectively enshrined in the British legal system for the first time under guidelines to help lawyers draft Sharia-compliant wills and estate planning documents.
Ground-breaking guidelines approved by the Law Society—the main professional association representing and governing the legal profession in England and Wales—provide details on how British lawyers should draft inheritance documents in order to comply with Islamic rules, which deny women an equal share of inheritances and exclude non-Muslims altogether.
The documents, which would be recognized by British courts, prevent children born out of wedlock—and even those who have been adopted—from being counted as legitimate heirs. In addition, anyone married in a civil ceremony or in a church could be excluded from inheritance under Sharia law, which recognizes only Muslim weddings for inheritance purposes.
Paragraph 3.6 of the guidelines recommends that some wills include a declaration of faith in Allah that would be drafted at a local mosque, and paragraph 5.2 hands responsibility for drawing up some papers to Sharia courts. Paragraph 2.3 of the guidelines suggests that Sharia law could overrule British law in inheritance disputes.
In April 2013, a documentary secretly filmed inside several of the 85 Islamic Sharia Law courts operating in Britain exposed the systematic discrimination that many women are suffering at the hands of Muslim jurists.
The documentary—Secrets of Britain's Sharia Courts—was filmed by the British Broadcasting Corporation and proved what had long been suspected: that Sharia courts, which operate in mosques and houses across Britain, routinely issue rulings on domestic and marital issues according to Sharia law that are at odds with British law.
In 2012, the British government began offering Muslim workers a Sharia-compliant pension fund in the public sector. A new government agency, the National Employment Savings Trust (NEST), will give Muslims who do not already have a company pension the option of investing in the HSBC Life Amanah Pension Fund, a Sharia-compliant pension scheme. The initial target market comprises some 200,000 Muslims in Britain.
In June 2011, Pointon York, an independent financial services company based in Leicestershire, announced that it would begin offering four Sharia-compliant Self-Invested Personal Pensions (SIPP) products that comply with Islamic law.
Pointon York was the first specialist SIPP provider to receive Sharia-compliant accreditation by the Islamic Bank of Britain (IBB), which has pioneered Islamic retail banking in the United Kingdom. The IBB will supervise the entire life-cycle of Pointon York's pension funds to ensure full compliance with Sharia legal principles.
Muslim families in Britain can already acquire Sharia-compliant baby bonds under the British government's Child Trust Fund scheme. In 2008, Britain's Financial Services Authority (FSA) authorized the establishment of the country's first Islamic insurance company as well as the country's first Sharia MasterCard, called the Cordoba Gold MasterCard.
In 2009, a report titled "Sharia Law or One Law for All?" found that scores of unofficial tribunals and councils regularly apply Islamic law to resolve domestic, marital and business disputes, many operating in mosques. The report warned of a "creeping" acceptance of Sharia principles in British law.





![The East German revolt of 1953
“The first real uprising, by working people, against the Communist and Socialist system.”
-Socialism Sucks
On June 17, 1953, East Germany (The German Democratic Republic ) (GDR) experienced a series of workers strikes, riots and demonstrations. This unrest became much more than just a strike as the populace attempted to rid themselves of Socialism and Communism.
"The ‘proletariat' had risen against the ‘dictatorship of the proletariat'."
-Christian Ostermann
(Well, imagine that !)
On the morning of 16th June 1953, 300 East Berlin construction workers went on strike after their superiors announced a pay cut, if they did not meet their new Socialist work quotas.
Their numbers quickly swelled and a general strike and protests were called for the next day.
Throughout the night of June16th and the morning of June 17th , reports of the events in East Berlin spread quickly throughout the GDR by radio broadcasts.
From all over East Berlin and the surrounding suburbs came the people !
The result?
More than one million people in about 700 localities.
As the numbers grew so did their confidence and determination,
They were there to rid themselves of communism, stop the inhumane human rights abuses and unrealistic quotas the Socialists had levied on them.
Demonstrators began to demand other changes too, such as free elections.
These Communist policies did not work and their Socialist economic demands were unrealistic.
Chants were heard calling for "Death to Communism" and
"Long live Eisenhower!"
The protests soon turned violent as the workers became more vocal and determined.
Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev decided to use force to stop the uprising. On June 17th 1953,
16 Soviet divisions with tanks, 20,000 soldiers and 8,000 KVP (Barracked People's Police) were used to quell the uprising.
How ?
They opened fire on unarmed civilians.
“By 09:00, some 25,000 people had gathered in front of the House of Ministries, and tens of thousands more were en route. Between 10:00 and 11:00, some 80 to 100 demonstrators apparently managed to storm the government seat. Only the sudden appearance of Soviet Army vehicles, and then tanks, seemed to prevent a complete takeover.
Within an hour, Soviet troops had cleared and isolated the area around the government headquarters. But fighting between Soviet forces (later also GDR police) and the demonstrators continued into the afternoon and night; eyewitnesses reported that in some instances the Soviets fired directly into the crowd:”
“It was awful to see [. . . ] how the crowds of people fell to the ground. One could immediately see several writhing on the ground, covered with blood; everybody screamed for ambulances and police."
-Wikipedia
The world knew and observed but, in fear of nuclear war, would not move to help the East Germans.
There would be no help !
This revolt was over.
Here's a video:
http://youtu.be/CzLI7WenYho
West Germany estimates of the number of people killed at:
513 people shot and killed in the street, 106 people executed under martial law (or later condemned to death) and 170 executed for political crimes.
1,838 were injured, and 5,100 were arrested (1,200 of these were later sentenced to an average of 5 years in penal camps).
17 Soviet soldiers were also executed.
Why?
They refused to shoot demonstrating workers.
Even they knew it was wrong !
Well, there it is !
Again !
Isn’t Socialism great ?
"The ‘proletariat' had risen against the ‘dictatorship of the proletariat'."
They always do.
“Know the history”](https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t1.0-9/q71/s480x480/10277594_816902625004218_5695694061013541084_n.jpg)


